Another Indo-Pak Confrontation Is On Its Way

Bairi Ram and his spouse, Purno Devi, assessing the destruction following the devastation inflicted on their residence by Pakistani shelling. Credit: Atul Loke/The New York Times.

Politics is the entertainment branch of industry — Frank Zappa, American guitarist

Conceivably, South Asia is generally perceived to be a most belligerent region with active armed conflict under the shadows of the nuclear weaponry in the world. The dissolution of the British Raj—on which the sun never set, was a case of failed politics of bait and switch against the mass freedom movement—in 1947 and hypocritical acts of Jinnah resulted in the rise of an official terror state—Pakistan—with India. Both rivial crispy policies engage in low-intense conflict wages by proxy war over the disputed region—Kashmir. [1] [2] The primary factors of the facts derived through the perpetual tension are the ongoing 2025 India–Pakistan crisis, which concluded by Pahalgam terror attack—the worst attack against Indian tourists in Kashmir (Central and southern portions of J&k) since an insurgency embarked in 1989 against India’s Kashmir. [3] In response to the terror attack, Indian armed forces orchestrated military strikes under “Operation Sindoor” on Pakistan's Punjab province and PoK; targeting and devastating nine terrorist camps of Jaish-e-Mohammad, Lashkar-e-Toiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. [4] [5] Although, in consequence thereof, the Pakistan shelling has utterly hit the Jammu district; at least 16 people—13 in Poonch and 3 in Rajouri—were killed, hundreds of structures, including residential houses and educational institutions, were completely damaged—an assault on non-combatants, while New Delhi endeavours to impair the terrorist camps. [6]

Additionally, the recent onerous geopolitical development between these two rivals has yet to accomplish an of every intellectual mind, compelled to break down the head, on US behaviour under the leadership of Donald Trump; the Tau'(ताऊ)—the right-wingers call Trump as Tau, the habit of considering politicians as a father figure—a Hindi term that denotes the father's elder brother; maybe, by any chance there will be any infidelit relationship.

That's a cold hard facts: India's retaliation is emphasizing amusement or gratification of the Indian masses amour propre. Those whose hearts were hot under the collar over the Pahalgam attack, though this retaliation neither ensures the fact; this reprisal apocalypse the ability of these terrorist groups to operate terror activities in the future, nor alters Pakistan's complicity to acknowledge attack in Kashmir. Unromantically, Islamabad exploited a tit-for-tat response—created panic through arbitrarily sheiling against Indian masses and yet expressed a desire for join the neutral transparent probe on the Pahalgam terror attack, which was rejected by New Delhi. [7] [8] This strategy has propped up Islamabad to install its stance globally over neoteric contentious development with India. [9] [10] Unilaterally, India acknowledged its retaliation through state actors within the jurisdictions of Pakistan—potentially the Pakistani Army responded with verve on masses of Poonch and shielded themselves from the repercussions. Even though after the immediate ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad—a ceasefire without any terms and conditions. [11] [12] Though the word ceasefire is also experienced in the vicious behaviour of Islamabad, as they violated the bilateral ceasefire more than 2 times—unacceptable behaviour—albeit, in spite of that Poonch public appreciation for Operation Sindoor hasn't appeared. [13] [14] However, the Pahalgam terror attackers are remains untraceable despite extensive combing operations; this is the ground why Operation Sindoor is not over yet. Notwithstanding, the banality of the Indian Military officer’s words has questioned government credibility; as though Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh issued a blunt warning over a strong call for accountability and urgency within India’s defence procurement, and during Operation Sindoor, the lost aircraft due to ‘constraint by political leadership,’ quoth Defence Attaché Navy Captain Shiv Kumar. India still needs more and more time than belief. [15] [16]

The fault lies not so much in “Elephant” stars as in it’s perspective, their diplomatic manoeuvres and perceptions for retaliation could be accomplished whether they wield non non-state as often as Islamabad articulates against India. Over the past few years, particularly after both built a ‘logic of deterrence’ through nuclear weapons in the 1990s, their military confrontations had been limited largely accompanying their border regions—New Delhi nuclear arsenal was the main cause, “Dragon” aided Islamabad’s nuclear development for regional rivalry with India. [17] [18] [19] While India in Operation Sindoor has struck Pok and areas close to it during periods of rising tensions, the New Delhi retaliation (Operation Sindoor) included strikes on Punjab province—mainland Pakistan—for the first time in more than half a century. The Pakistani government called the Indian strikes “an unprovoked and blatant act of war” that had violated Pakistan’s sovereignty—potentially arouse Islamabad install its stance globally. [20] The India–US relationship has also been tested by Washington’s position during the recent India–Pakistan hostilities. In the course of tension, T-Trump termed India's retaliation as a shame, mounted pressure for de-escalation, plundered the credit of ceasefire, and what is more, allocated billions through the puppet organisation(IMF) to the pakistan (a gold medal to terrorists in the terror competition) and advancing stupid deeds to humiliate India. [21] The way PM Modi's friend T-Trump humiliates India, not ever anyone can conceive. [22] Moreover, still White House and New Delhi continue to see each other as vital strategic partners in the context of a long-term rivalry with China, and these developments—India refused to endorse a joint statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China as it did not reflect the country's concerns on terrorism—will not undermine the relationship. [23]

Nevertheless, Pakistan is a keen interest of the Washington; not long ago, Pakistani cooperation with US counterterrorism campaign has been strong: their government permitted the CIA to fly armed drones over Pakistan’s remote tribal areas, where many militants hide. Between 1959 and 1970, Pakistan provided a base near Peshawar for the CIA to use as a listening post for radio transmission intercepts from the Soviet Union. [24] 1980s, the both allies cooperated closely in the Afghan war, which was fought from Pakistani soil by Afghan guerrillas organised and trained by the Pakistani military's intelligence arm, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). [25] The Americans set up a physical presence in Afghanistan and began to use Pakistan as its supply route as well as a source of ground intelligence after the 11 September 2001 attack on the US. Initially, the agency even based its drones on Pakistani soil, working off a list jointly drawn up with its ISI counterparts, perhaps still the cooperation take shelter, the reason India never interferes in the Baloch because CIA might expose it. [26]

It's an indispensable point for a country like India, a victim of terrorism and being betrayed by the West, to examine why the Washington indirectly backs Pakistan and how; the historical CIA and ISI collaborated (an association which was described as a 'permanent structure') on counterterrorism intelligence. Trump clears $397 million for Pakistan’s F-16 fighter fleet in this day of tension. Altogether, over the past 15 years, the US had provided approximately $15 billion in CSF, $4 billion in Foreign Military Financing, $1.4 billion in Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund, and $52 million in International Military Education and Training funds and blah blah blah. In Operation Sindoor, Indian armed forces targeted 11 Pakistani airbases, and following the strikes, there was no military response from Islamabad, as its air defence had collapsed. The three targeted airbases—Sargodha, Jacobabad, and Chaklala—were critical due to their infrastructure and maintenance facilities for US-origin F-16 jets. [27] These bases also store key armaments for the US jets and serve as hubs for F16 training and operations. [28] US-made F-16s demonstrated catastrophe, and further, Chinese JF-17s and J-10s couldn’t defend their skies—and were effortlessly neutralized by Indian warfare and missile capabilities. India’s triumphant precision strikes not merely put egg on their face Islamabad, albeit also the Western military industry—Western money flows were endangered, the reason they mounted pressure on both rivals during the turbulent chessboard of South Asian politics. [29] For all that, the termination of the Shimla Agreement—the agreement essentially excludes third-party mediation (including Uncle Sam) from the Kashmir issue and formalised the the Line of Control—in response to India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty—could make Uncle Sam independent to put it’s mole oar in the Kashmir. [30]

Thus, Operation Sindoor brought to light T-Trump wisdom towards New Delhi and besmirched India's diplomacy. The main reason for White House under Trumps—the unprecedented behaviour—is, Indeed, that India’s inability to match China in the future, as well as its commitment to multipolarity, which is fundamentally at odds with American interests, will be deeply inconvenient for the United States. [31] [32] India, it seems, will partner with the United States on some things involving China, but it is unlikely to partner with Washington in every significant arena—even when it comes to Beijing. Howbeit, former national security adviser M.K. Narayanan says: “The US policy today is based on cold realism and on what the other country has to offer. Had our diplomats and politicians not been blind-sided by their own perceptions, they might have seen what was coming. It should have been evident that Trump did not see India as being in the same league as China, Russia or other ‘near coequals’. In Trump’s benefit analysis, there was little room for an India that spouts ‘diplomatese’ but had nothing to give in return. In this respect, China had more to offer the US; even Pakistan had more to give—location-wise, minerals-wise and also a willingness to be a ‘cringe ally’. India had little to offer by way of trade or strategic support.” [33]

Kashmir is, to Pakistan, a ‘lodestone.’ It goes without saying that the tactical Pakistan asserted its haughtiness through non-state actors—the brainwashed Kashmiri Youth: both instructive OGW and attacker’s. It is testified for certain that Islamabad commenced atrocities by sending forth non-state actors from its tribal areas to seize Kashmir despite having a standstill agreement with Kashmir’s sovereign—Maharaja Hari Singh—similarly in the Kargil Conflict. [34] [35] [36] Pakistan continued using sabotage and covert operations to destabilise the region throughout the following decades, a valuable lesson from the first failure—gambit paying off, as C. Christine Fair has pointed out in ‘Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War’. [37] After a month of investigation, NIA proclaims the Pahalgam terror attackers are authentically Pakistani and they all remain untraceable, yet the confusion is not untangled; India's recent delegation has lost precious ammo, which could globally condemn the Pakistani, rather than the terrorist attack against India—no country in the world even denounces Pakistan for the Pahalgam attack. [38] [39]

From Inder Malhotra’s point of view, Pakistan asserts that Kashmir is an “unfinished part of the agenda of Partition.” [40] The partition of the subcontinent in 1947 was unaccomplished because of the solely Muslim-majority province in British India, as Ashley J. Tellis wrote in ‘Stability in South Asia’. [41] Pakistani military needs itself to conflict over Kashmir with India to justify its own critical existence—Pakistani Army would be unable to vindicate its vastness and hegemon character sans threatening India, ideologically and materially. [42] The Pakistani military’s centrality has also been shaped by repeated wars with India—in 1948, 1965, 1971, and 1999—predominantly over Kashmir. As per Muhammad Badar Alam, a political analyst, the sense of a perpetual threat posed by India is “one of the fundamental factors” that gave the military a prominent position in Pakistani society, politics and governance. Inasmuch as the conventional warfare in 1999—the Kargil Battle—India has accused Pakistan with numerous authentications for fanning the flames of blood and thunder on its soil by reinforcing terrorize elements, particularly in Indian-administered Kashmir. [43]

The founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah along with numerous leaders and military chiefs—e.g. Pak Army General Asim Munir remarks on Kashmir just days before Pahalgam attack—have promulgated a hoax narrative—emphasized the significance of Kashmir for Pakistan, describing it as the ‘jugular vein’—since Pakistan was brought into being as official terror state. [44] [45] India’s national security installation must therefore approach all military crises with Pakistan with a crystal-clear comprehension of these ethnic and psychological underpinnings—It’s up against Pakistani strategic behaviour that is galvanized less by calibrated estimation, but more by identity-driven posturing and an inflated self-image. [46] Nathless, Pakistan's ingrained behaviour won't ameliorate, and due to the Kashmir issue, apparently, further indignation and hostilities will billow.

Pakistan's chief character [Muhammad Ali Jinnah] hierarchises its own acquisitiveness above all else [masses], its existence and narrative emerged from deep-rooted religious animosities [primary motivation was political]. Whereas India's internal politics [religious and caste polarization] is an opportunity for Islamabad, in contrast, New Delhi has serendipity time on its side.

In ‘The Changing Dynamics of Civil Military Relations in Pakistan’, Rabia Chaudhry uses the term ‘military hegemony’ to represent the military’s monopolistic control over both strategic and security issues as well as political institutions and processes. [47] It possesses the authority to set something in motion, prescribe or proscribe all political action. Comprehensively, militaries are inducted into their hegemonic role through an opportunistic coming together of certain internal and external factors. The extrinsic factors include security apprehensions both in the form of (real or per-ceived) threats on its own borders as well as international strategic alliances forged with other countries. The country’s military became a mainstay of Pakistani politics by forging ‘strategic alliance with the United States in the 1950s and later economic and military assistance in 1980s’ and mobilising tricky security relations with ‘India, [the] Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, and Khomeni’s revolution in Iran’ to its selfward purpose.

Straightaway, strike up a conversation on the far inalienable problem, a subject of concern marley for India—the funding of the draconian terrorist activism. As far Pakistan Defence Minister admits to backing terror groups for 3 decades; as he says they possess a dirty work for US, west including Britain. Hence, the terrorist groups put up numerous NGOs—a cunning plan to gain support—across Pakistan. For instance, Lashkar-e-Taiba operates 16 Islamic institutions, more than 130 schools, madrassa, an ambulance service as well as hospital, mobile clinics, blood banks and seminaries across Pakistan the organisation—an extensive network of social welfare donated by global Islamic NGOs, businessmen (including Kashmiri businessmen) as well as diaspora communities in the Persian Gulf, UK, and other nations, sometimes under the guise of humanitarian relief. [48] 

In her ‘In Their Own Words: Understanding Lashkar-e-Tayyaba,’ Christine Fair estimates: By the end of the 90s, the Urdu monthly magazine Mujallah al-Dawah had a circulation of 100 000, another monthly magazine, Ghazwa,had a circulation 20 000, while other weekly and monthly publications target students, women, children and those who are literate in English or Arabic. It also publishes, every year, around 100 booklets in several languages. It has been described as a “profitable department, selling lacs of books every year.” [49]

Furthermore, other terrorist groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed (Abdul Rauf Azhar linked Al Rehmat Trust) have a documented history of operating NGOs and social welfare organizations, ‘The Militant Challenge in Pakistan (2011),’ Christine Fair wrote in her article. [50] Similarly, Jamaat-e-Islami, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and Hizb-ul-Mujahideen have an extensive network of schools, clinics, seminaries at the mercy of madrasas in Pakistan, particularly PoK. The organizations like Jamaat-ud-Dawa and Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation of Lashkar-e-Taiba have already been prohibited by the UN—a Western puppet—and Uncle Sam, but the indirect link still exists. Out of the blue, the body UN or any bricks of West Allies has no factors to wipe out the sponsorship by reason of that Western interest for terrorism as right as rain. [51]

The Pahalgam incident was the deadliest in the Muslim-majority region since a suicide-bomb extinguished paramilitary forces in 2019. In this barbarous terror attack the terrorist ensured that all their victims were Hindu by forcing them to spell out their names, and seeing if they could recite Islamic verses before gunning them down. [52] [53] Prior to wrap [your] head around the core element [religion] of this age, India's surroundings, personally speaking, these are the precious stone and a vigorous approach for Pakistan. The Islamabad are used the chief elements of contemporary Indian politics as their narratives are already rectified in one stance—Indians are Islamophobic. [54] Afterwards Islamabad advocated noiseless ambush now they blow the bullet with clangour. As an illustration, the terrorists of the deadly Pahalgam attack were Pakistani nationals from the UN-proscribed militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). One of the terrorists, Suleman, was involved in the killing of three Army personnel in South Kashmir’s Kulgam district in August 2023, and in another attack in Jammu’s Poonch district in May last year, wherein an Air Force personnel was killed and four others injured. [55] Though, in 2024 the Reasi attack has been peaceful for the past two decades, but the recent unprecedented activities have brought a sense of paranoia: terrorists of Lashkar-e-Taiba opened fire on a passenger bus transporting Hindu pilgrims from the Shiv Khori cave to Katra—nine people were killed in the attack, and an additional 41 were afflicted. [56]

Throughout a decade and beyond, terrorism had primarily been confined to the tumultuous Kashmir Valley with some isolated incidents in other parts of J&K. For all that, the arrangement changed with the first dawn of 2023 when terrorists executed seven people in the border district of Rajouri—the first such major attack in the Jammu division in years. [57] [58] Since In the previous year alone plenteous attacks have struck the Reasi, Kathua, Doda and Rajouri districts in Jammu, which indicates the geographical shift of these terror attacks sows the seeds of a strategic broadening of terrorist objectives and changed in modus operandi—counter-terror tactics— that were effective in Kashmir may not translate well to the distinct geopolitical and social landscape of Jammu. [59] These new standard attacks signalled to both the Indian public and government servants. [60] Even though multiple reports confirm that advance intelligence warnings were available before both the Pulwama and Pahalgam attacks, albeit preventive measures were not taken, which already questioned by Satyapal Malik (10th and last Governor of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, from August 2018 to October 2019)—ignored warnings, lack of preventive action, and absence of accountability. Unequivocally, despite the boiled water at thin ice, Pakistan accomplished Dragon desire in these high alert regions. [61] [62] [63] [64] For the political parties, honestly the Indian army's operations can be politicised, but there are no enclaves for the accountability.’ Till this date, India's complicity has been targeted due to a lack of R&D initiative, it's not fugged up at all. The realistic factor is insisted on New Delhi intelligence, which seeks tech assistance from Washington because R&D budgets have been down over the last few year—for instance, the FBI had helped the NIA crack the account run by a Jaish-e-Mohammed handlers of the Pulwama attack. [65] [66] [67]

The monumental essence; so dubbed ceasefire, reinforced panicked Islamabad to lodge its thirst again—to rebuild, regroup, and rearm. These sorts of humongous terror events are prevailing when a large segment of India is kept away from its own national problems as media as politicians. The large segment of India always rollicks about the global political stage while neglecting their own predicament—recognising leaders of Washington and Moscow as father figures. Specifically, Manipur: the state forgotten by its own country while focusing on others—Israel, Ukrain, Russia, Gaza, Trump, blah blah. “The state is now ‘stateless.’ Life and property can be destroyed anytime by anyone just like in Libya, Lebanon, Nigeria, Syria,” says Lt. Gen. L. Nishikanta Singh. [68]

Pakistan, with notable efficacy, blackmails the international community through its nuclear arsenal. [69] [70] [71] Indeed, even though the same term has been stirred up by Minister of External Affairs S. Jaishankar to the global community to unite in ensuring that terrorists face no impunity, are not treated as proxies, and that there is “no yielding to nuclear blackmail.” [72] The threat posed by Pakistan’s use of terror is unalterable and apparently, further indignation and hostilities will billow—as General Munir’s fresh rhetorical statement: India describes as terrorism is a “legitimate struggle” and that Islamabad will continue providing political, diplomatic, and moral support to Kashmiri terrorists. [73] Case in point that, the Islamabad rebuilding its terror camps and launchpads destroyed in Operation Sindoor. [74] Whether South Asia will perpetuate to be known as a conflict-prone zone because of the one reason, Dragon and Islamabad—there is a fear of the threat of what they dubbed ‘global Islamic terrorism’ and the apprehension that Islamabad’s nuclear arsenal might fall into the hands of these terrorist groups, so the military regime in Islamabad has been portrayed as the protector of Western interests in West as well as South Asia. [75] [76] [77] [78]

Thus far, India's Hindutva politics have also hindered its foreign relations, as Ashley J. Tellis cites—those conflicts could also spill over into India's neighbourhood, as the ideological animus against minorities exacerbates tension with both Dhaka and Islamabad. India's inner politics, extremely Hindutva politics, bolstered Pakistan to exercise its fake narrative factory, or ‘info war’ against India. [79] [80] The fact was recently reflected when China, Pakistan, Bangladesh are working together to establish a new regional bloc with the potential to replace SAARC. [81] [82] Although, red Chinese persecuted Uyghurs (predominantly Sunni Islam) and other Turkic Muslim minorities. Meanwhile, China’s influence made it more desirable for these two fundamental terror states. [83] The Indo-Bangladesh combination of a long, porous border, active legal trade, persistent smuggling routes, and socio-economic factors has enhanced connectivity through rivers, ports, and land routes and has made the movement of soft influence across significant portions of West Bengal and the Northeastern states. [84] [85] [86] [87] Sri Lanka and Maldives are the snakes in the grass, mere begging for India's funds, albeit support China and Pakistan—worthless states. [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] There is the gigantic fool's paradise existing in the perception of the Indian masses over monarchial Nepal and Hindu nationalism—the bhai-bhai combination. In earnest terms, the Nepal monarchy was never the steadfast Indian ally—Nostalgically, in 1960, King Mahendra with a royal coup, dismantled the nascent democracy, vanquished pro-India leaders, and aligned Nepal within an ace of the Dragon. The same standard recurred with King Gyanendra, during his power grab between 2005 and 2008. [94] [95] [96] [97]

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and un-less the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance with his instincts, he will ac-cept it even on the slenderest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way, and much of what is currently believed in international affairs is no better than myth — Bertrand Russell, British philosopher [98]

Present-day India's diplomacy appeared more as a half-idealistic transparent glass than pragmatism. Whereas the pragmatism felicitously brought to light India’s diplomacy with practical approaches by India's erstwhile prime ministers—Narshima Rao, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and Manmohan Singh—after the 1991 economic reforms. [99] [100] [101] Thereupon, up to a point, how India's vishwaguru diplomacy surprisingly comes across and flabbergasts the Indian masses highlights the distinguishable factors, what they smell in Insta-reels, YouTube, other platforms, and mainstream media and what the reality feels like. History has surrounded the question [a bloodshed balm] on India's diplomacy—yes, our PM Modi and MEI J. Shankar with electric sparklers on their eyes—yapping by the future. India has lost its shoulders (backer) who can condemn and vilify Pakistan. It's astonishing for everyone to feel the cause—the “Bin pendi ka lota” policy—definitely the last straw—It's neither non-alignment nor multi-alignment; honestly it's half idealistic transparent glass—Soft Power policy. [102] Even M.K. Narayanan (former national security adviser, former director of IB, and former governor of West Bengal) moved to write: “the current impasse should be a ‘wake-up call’ for those who have been arguing that non-alignment is dead and are leaning towards the concept of ‘multi-alignment’, a newly coined euphemism for seeking closer links with the US and the West. We are currently at a stage where we are not with the non-aligned. Nor have we succeeded in getting adherents for multi-alignment. Meanwhile, we appear to have been overtaken by the sheer thrust of cascading events….” [103]

Medals and civilian honours couldn't accelerate foreign policy, or hit the nail on the head in the crises… New India, Vishwaguru, Ghar Me Ghuskar and Danka Baj rahe hai are genuinely demonstrate extra cheese political interests rather than national ones; as though India never hit its adversary and positively rose in its stand globally before the person with the highest civilian honours, whose whole career has been based on criticising and blaming Pandit Nehru. The country’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, pledged that India would never become a ‘camp follower’ of any super power, that would never be crippled by anyone, particularly his principal faultfinder and influential critic being in power. [104] [105] The West doesn't care about words and doesn't need an attitude that describes no need; the West wishes for effective and stable trade without degrading images of the nation. Indians strived in a belief perspective instead of assumption, Indian audience believed in vocal performance over realistic performances. [106] In light of current circumstances, it would be prudent for New Delhi ought to emulate familiar strategies undertaken by its predecessor in Pradhānamantrī Kāryālaya—Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh. If India continues to forsake its tremendous challenges, that could jeopardize the country's social stability and national power.

India fundamentally had lost its standing in the Global South alongwith its prestige, crumbles under pressure like a house of cards and not standing up to international bullies. [107] [108] [109] India recognised Vishwaguru within the jurisdiction of the Internet, although the actual problems do not exist in Sansad Bhawan—these are not a big deal for the members of parliament to commence a debate, but hours-to-hours comedy. The continent of Asia is also home to China: another nuclear-armed country with a huge population, a developed army, and an enormous economy—literate, skilled, and comparatively healthy population; greater technological proficiency; and larger capital stocks, including substantial investments in critical technologies, such as artificial intelligence, robotics, energy storage, and information and communications, which could improve growth despite its demographic constraints. [110] [111] [112] Beijing has been forthright in speaking on behalf of the Global South, expressing solidarity with developing economies against the disruption of global trade, and inviting India to get on board conveying the concerns of developing economies. [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120]

Over and above that, India will certainly grow yet less able to wield that strength for purposeful means, with a slightly global wave. [121] [122] [123] No one [countries] except the White House could back Elephant to counter Dragon, even if New Delhi is able to match Dragon in the future but unlikely Elephant cannot effectively counter Dragon in Asia; the White House invariably anxious about Indian wishes—a multipolar world. [124] [125] [126] For New Delhi, QUAD can be a priority, but BRICS— a non-western international org—is indispensable for India's proficiency. [127] [128] [129] [130] Dragon is arming regimes and non-state actors that challenge its rival, making war a business and a strategy. [131] [132] What's more, New Delhi and Washington differ in their thinking about deterrence, and this is evident in three categories crucial to defence—capability, geography, and interoperability. During the heart of boiled tension, China shared satellite intel on India and examinate its tools, admits the Pakistan Defence Minister. Even though, in this conflict whatever, Beijing desired about New Delhi's strategy and military accomplishments, Islamabad had brought it to fruition. In the years ahead, if China blooms even a bit faster—let's assume a mere three percent annually—it could end up with an economy that is closer to three times as large as India's—even if India uplifts at six, or seven percent. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137]

I urge [you] to heed my words, as [I am] unequivocally repeating for the final time. India needs to clamp down the half-witted to associate [be a realistic as cold realistic] with the West, beside the statement making India incentivise its policy for the BRICS to shape more intense economic advancements—What’s more, it will summon the strength of India's capabilities and potential to encourage it to use its time for good purpose—and, as far more important , repeal frivolous spending (obviously, india is a developing nation, before allocating props to other look inward—19 crore Indian including adults and children faced empty stomachs every night, shrinking per capita, a jobless economy, a grave education system, a weak authority body, rampant corruption, injustice, inequality worse than the British Raj and nepotism as inherited form Western colonialism) plus strengthen the self-reliance belief through accumulating human capital. Ultimately, India’s actual regional adversary is not to be tracked in Islamabad but in Beijing. Instead of yielding to the prospect of attacking Islamabad with ‘state actors’ (Perhaps it will be good for Elephant to put non-state actors), New Delhi would make persistent progress in technologising and modernising its armed forces as well as alter inequality within the country (powerful country is strongly corresponding to country level of performance per capita. whilst at 2047—the centenary of independence—India has yet to pivot on external partners to keep Chinese power at bay)—that may not only nip Pakistan in the bud but also another its curiosity against China. 

Refrence:

1. Role of Jinnah in Partition of India- Pakistan by Kavita Sharma, International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116, Volume-4, Issue-8, August 2018 Pages 05-07
2. Stability in South Asia by Ashley J. Tellis
3. 2025 Pahalgam attack – Wikipedia https://share.google/Hdk8iJhtjBckPCQkg
4. Press Release:Press Information Bureau https://share.google/y31LONjhH2jwCgo2F
5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflictan_conflict
6. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2025/May/24/31-schools-damaged-in-pak-shelling-in-poonch-rajouri
7. https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/heavy-pak-shelling-leaves-trail-destruction-in-j-ks-poonch/articleshow/120959768.cms
8. https://www.google.com/search?q=pakistan+ask+for+neutral+joint&oq=pakistan+ask+for+neutral+joint&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigAdIBCTExNDIxajBqOagCDrACAfEFp4_vfxqzG8TxBaeP738asxvE&client=tablet-android-realme-terr1-rso1&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
9. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/all-that-matters/in-battle-of-the-delegations-real-story-lies-in-what-went-unsaid/articleshow/121852910.cms
10. https://www.arabnews.com/node/2603540/pakistan
11. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/20/uneasy-india-pakistan-ceasefire-holds-but-is-a-return-to-war-inevitable?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
12. https://thediplomat.com/2025/06/india-pakistan-relations-after-the-ceasefire/
13. https://www.newsonair.gov.in/pakistan-violates-ceasefire-hours-after-pact-drone-spotted-near-loc/#:~:text=The%20Pakistani%20army%20has%20violated,military%20action%20by%20both%20countries.
14. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pahalgam-terror-attack-moosa-fauji-lashkar-hunt-continues-jammu-kashmir-2729019-2025-05-23
15. https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/topstories/we-are-not-getting-the-best-people-iaf-chief-warns-top-talent-leaving-india-calls-for-better-pay-in-defence-sector/ar-AA1FIn6E?apiversion=v2&noservercache=1&domshim=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1&batchservertelemetry=1&noservertelemetry=1
16. https://theprint.in/defence/iaf-lost-some-jets-in-op-sindoor-over-political-constraint-to-not-hit-military-indian-defence-attache/2674410/
17. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Dragon_and_the_Elephant.html?id=STGYuz8JJt8C
18. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB114/press.htm
19. Chinese-Pakistani Nuclear/Missile Ties and the Balance of Power by T.V. PAUL
20. https://world.newsx.com/world/pakistans-foreign-minister-responds-to-operation-sindoor-alleges-violation-of-sovereignty/
21. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-pmo-says-imf-has-approved-1-billion-loan/article69558903.ece
22. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/india-and-t-trump-a-gaslighting-ties?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
23. https://theprint.in/opinion/india-sco-boycott-pakistan-terror/2679097/
24. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/southasiasource/adrian-levy-and-the-myth-of-pakistans-inter-services-intelligence/
25. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42664019
26. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-pakistan-supports-terrorist-groups-and-why-the-us-finds-it-so-hard-to-induce-change
27. https://usfcr.com/search/opportunities/?oppId=9031b52801d1451bb6de71c9771d465e&utm
28. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/india/iaf-strikes-at-pindi-two-other-vital-bases-forced-pak-to-seek-us-help
29. https://thesupremerights.com/the-ceasefire-lie-how-india-faced-diplomatic-deceit/
30. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/28/kashmir-attack-why-pakistans-threat-to-suspend-simla-agreement-matters
31. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/india-and-t-trump-a-gaslighting-ties?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
32. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/india/indias-great-power-delusions
33. https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/2025/06/28/trump-does-not-see-india-as-being-in-the-same-league-as-china-russia-or-other-near-coequals-mk-narayanan.html
34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232937834_The_First_Kashmir_War_Revisited
35. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/sa/sa_oct01app01.html
36. https://www.idsa.in/askanexpert/anil-kumar-rathee-asked-how-external-state-and-non-state-actors-are-creating-problems-in-indias-internal-security#:~:text=The%20use%20of%20non%2Dstate%20actors%20is%20essentially,state%20of%20Pakistan%20a%20degree%20of%20deniability.&text=Therefore%2C%20the%20non%2Dstate%20actors%20operating%20from%20Pakistan,under%20a%20clear%20charter%20of%20state%20policy
37. C. Christine Fair, Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War, pp. 150-210
38. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/three-pahalgam-attackers-pakistan-sketches-jammu-kashmir-police-nia-probe-10081949/
39. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/india-and-t-trump-a-gaslighting-ties?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
40. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/rear-view-the-sudden-war/
41. Stability in South Asia by Ashley J. Tellis
42. https://gppi.net/2025/05/07/indias-kashmir-dilemma#:~:text=Pakistan's%20founder%20Muhammad%20Ali%20Jinnah,every%20possible%20aspect%20of%20life.%E2%80%9D
43. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/20/how-conflict-with-india-helped-boost-the-pakistan-militarys-domestic-image#:~:text=The%20Pakistani%20military's%20centrality%20has%20also%20been,in%20full%20but%20control%20only%20parts%20of.&text=Lahore%2Dbased%20Alam%20told%20Al%20Jazeera%20that%20Modi's,helped%20the%20Pakistani%20military%20justify%20its%20power.
44. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c39j3p14mg4o
45. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/how-kashmir-was-won-from-mountbatten-jinnah/articleshow/70560879.cms
46. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/tackling-pakistans-anti-india-security-strategy
47. Rabia Chaudhry, The Changing Dynamics of Civil Military Relations in Pakistan, pp. 10-13
48. https://web.archive.org/web/20090117041048/http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/states/jandk/terrorist_outfits/lashkar_e_toiba.htm
49. https://academic.oup.com/book/35144/chapter-abstract/299339330?redirectedFrom=fulltext
50. https://christinefair.net/pubs/AP11_F_MilitantPakistan.pdf
51. https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/summaries/entity/lashkar-e-tayyiba
52. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/04/29/india-must-prove-pakistans-complicity-in-the-attack-in-kashmir
53. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/india-and-pakistan-are-perilously-close-to-the-brink/
54. https://www.spsmai.com/experts-speak/?id=375&q=Pakistan-s-info-war
55. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/three-pahalgam-attackers-pakistan-sketches-jammu-kashmir-police-nia-probe-10081949/
56. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Reasi_attack
57. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/terrorism-in-jammu-and-kashmir-why-poonch-rajouri-are-the-new-terror-hotbed-2487506-2024-01-11?
58. https://m.thewire.in/article/security/jammu-new-wave-terrorism-divergent-tactics-unseen?
59. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/col-nagial/terrorists-attack-in-poonch/?
60. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/terrorism-in-jammu-and-kashmir-why-poonch-rajouri-are-the-new-terror-hotbed-2487506-2024-01-11?
61. https://kashmirtimes.com/opinion/comment-articles/calculated-inactions-or-intelligence-failure?
62. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2023/Apr/25/wrong-to-say-im-questioningpulwama-attack-onlyafter-demitting-office-satya-pal-malik-2569229.html?
63. https://youtu.be/3Q9Mx3zdsZs?si=40qVvSaFbzPA_9wo
64. https://www.samaa.tv/2087332976-shameless-and-coward-modi-must-apologise-to-india-for-pahalgam-satya-pal-malik?
65. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-tech/rd-funding-still-meagre-in-india/article68935403.ece
66. https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/indias-rd-spends-amongst-the-lowest-in-the-world-niti-aayog-study/articleshow/93024586.cms
67. https://www.indiavsdisinformation.com/20200827/thanks-to-fbi-india-now-knows-who-the-handlers-of-pulwama-attack-were-reporting-to
68. https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/manipur-violence-army-veteran-says-the-state-is-now-stateless-just-like-syria/cid/1945694
69. https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/who-has-the-hand-on-pakistans-nuclear-button/articleshow/122265651.cms
70. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rajnath-singh-pakistan-nuclear-weapons-operation-sindoor-action-iaea/article69578589.ece
71. https://www.facebook.com/firstpostin/videos/afghan-mp-in-exile-calls-out-pakistans-nuclear-blackmail-firstpost-pov/3076526815846926/
72. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/no-impunity-to-terrorists-no-yielding-to-nuclear-blackmail-eam-jaishankar-at-un/article69758206.ece
73. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pakistan-army-chief-asim-munir-backs-terror-groups-operating-in-jammu-and-kashmir-101751269975573.html
74. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pakistan-terror-camps-rebuilding-occupied-kashmir-is-army-operation-sindoor-2747622-2025-06-28
75. Pakistan’s Nuclear Strategy by Smruti S. Pattanaik
76. https://x.com/htTweets/status/1922530793844293680?t=9kpAJws9G9mvvvKSS3Httg&s=19
77. https://youtu.be/A5i_MX405MY?si=bM6_P-OlUgaa3prZ
78. https://youtu.be/5vEDG1XcJnI?si=cG7PR_LsXt-uU2vg
79. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/india/indias-great-power-delusions?check_logged_in=1&utm_medium=promo_email&utm_source=lo_flows&utm_campaign=article_link&utm_term=article_email&utm_content=20250701
80. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/india/hindu-nationalist-foreign-policy
81. https://www.news18.com/world/china-pakistan-working-to-establish-new-regional-block-saarc-replacement-9411911.html
82. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-china-working-to-establish-new-regional-bloc-with-potential-to-replace-saarc-report/article69754473.ece
83. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China
84. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh%E2%80%93India_border?
85. https://cenjows.in/the-changing-dynamics-of-india-bangladesh-relations-navigating-cooperation-and-challenges/?
86. https://neindiabroadcast.com/2025/04/28/smuggling-attempt-thwarted-on-border-bsf-apprehends-4-bangladeshi-smugglers-with-contraband/?
87. https://www.manoramayearbook.in/current-affairs/india/2025/01/14/india-border-management.html?
88. https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/wont-allow-anti-india-deeds-in-lanka-akd/articleshow/116377068.cms
89. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Sri_Lanka_relations
90. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/india-sri-lanka-aid-trade-9729776/
91. https://www.orfonline.org/research/understanding-the-india-out-campaign-in-maldives
92. https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/india-extends-financial-support-to-maldives-via-rollover-of-usd-50-million-treasury-bill/articleshow/121099753.cms
93. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Maldives_relations
94. https://thediplomat.com/2025/06/indias-monarchy-fantasy-in-nepal-is-a-strategic-mirage/
95. https://thediplomat.com/2020/06/5-factors-driving-anti-india-sentiment-in-nepal/
96. https://frontline.thehindu.com/world-affairs/south-asia-anti-india-sentiments-rise-in-neighbourhood-bangaldesh-sri-lanka-nepal-maldives/article68049487.ece
97. https://bharatshakti.in/nepals-monarchy-and-india-a-historical-relationship-of-complexity-and-contradictions/
98. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/156291-if-a-man-is-offered-a-fact-which-goes-against
99. https://ia801906.us.archive.org/9/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.14466/2015.14466.Foreign-Policy-Of-India-Under-Narasimha-Rao-Government_text.pdf
100. https://indiasworld.in/manmohan-singhs-foreign-policy-legacy/
101. A STUDY ON INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY DURING THE PRIME MINISTER OF ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE” by S. Rama Murthy
102. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/india-and-t-trump-a-gaslighting-ties?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
103. https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/2025/06/28/trump-does-not-see-india-as-being-in-the-same-league-as-china-russia-or-other-near-coequals-mk-narayanan.html
104. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/india/indias-great-power-delusions?check_logged_in=1&utm_medium=promo_email&utm_source=lo_flows&utm_campaign=article_link&utm_term=article_email&utm_content=20250701
105. https://theprint.in/opinion/great-speeches/doesnt-matter-what-war-we-wont-take-part-in-it-unless-weve-to-defend-ourselves-nehru/1977287/
106. https://www.journalofpoliticalscience.com/uploads/archives/7-3-9-326.pdf
107. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/pratap-bhanu-mehta-writes-indias-delusion-of-relevance-9810515/
108. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/india-and-t-trump-a-gaslighting-ties?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
109. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/why-is-new-india-not-bharat?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
110. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/2025-04-23-how-china-india-relations-will-shape-asia-global-order-bajpaee-jie.pdf
111. https://www.ide.go.jp/library/Japanese/Publish/Reports/AjikenPolicyBrief/pdf/209.pdf
112. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/india/india-will-carve-its-own-path#:~:text=Any%20hint%20Modi%27s%20government%20was,for%20fisheries%20in%20sovereign%20waters.
113. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2024/12/the-challenges-behind-chinas-global-south-policies?lang=en
114. https://www.gmfus.org/news/china-and-rising-global-south
115. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-winning-global-south-212370
116. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/06/26/can-china-still-be-meaningfully-classified-as-part-of-the-global-south/
117. https://chinaglobalsouth.com/
118. https://theweek.com/politics/china-winning-global-south
119. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2024/08/01/chinese-companies-are-winning-the-global-south
120. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/global-public-opinion-china/public-opinion-china-global-south
121. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/pratap-bhanu-mehta-writes-how-technology-affects-balance-of-power-and-the-lesson-for-india-9952330/
122. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/faltering-dragon-chinese-slowdown-global-economy-and-indian-imperatives
123. https://open.substack.com/pub/kumarmayank09/p/why-is-new-india-not-bharat?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3qcr6p
124. https://in.usembassy.gov/united-states-india-joint-leaders-statement/
125. https://www.orfonline.org/research/india-s-trade-strategy-with-china-will-have-to-rely-on-a-managed-rivalry#:~:text=Washington%20has%20become%20India's%20largest%20goods%2Dtrade%20partner,healthy%20surplus%20of%20more%20than%20US$41%20billion.
126. https://www.hudson.org/foreign-policy/india-us-need-each-other-combat-china-dont-let-domestic-politics-come-way-aparna-pande
127. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_Security_Dialogue#:~:text=The%20Quad%20is%20a%20grouping%20of%20Australia%2C,is%20maintained%20by%20talks%20between%20member%20countries.&text=In%20a%20joint%20statement%2C%20the%20Quad%20members,are%20needed%20to%20counter%20Chinese%20maritime%20claims.
128. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3371481/limited-hard-balancing-explaining-indias-counter-response-to-chinese-encircleme/#:~:text=India%20has%20faced%20numerous%20challenges,a%20way%20to%20contain%20China.
129. https://www.orfonline.org/research/india-and-the-quad#:~:text=Joining%20the%20Quad%20has%20both,engagement%20in%20the%20Indo%2DPacific.
130. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/07/back-back-brics-and-quad-meetings-highlight-indias-increasingly-difficult-balancing-act
131. https://www.moneycontrol.com/world/pakistan-russia-houthis-and-africa-s-militias-why-chinese-weapons-are-turning-up-in-every-major-war-zone-article-13219966.html
132. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/06/16/indian-factor-in-brics-de-dollarization-dream/
133. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/army-deputy-chief-operation-sindoor-faced-3-foes-pakistan-china-turkiye/articleshow/122257490.cms
134. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/04/29/india-must-prove-pakistans-complicity-in-the-attack-in-kashmir
135. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/06/16/indian-factor-in-brics-de-dollarization-dream/
136. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/india/indias-great-power-delusions?check_logged_in=1&utm_medium=promo_email&utm_source=lo_flows&utm_campaign=article_link&utm_term=article_email&utm_content=20250701
137. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/calibrated-force-operation-sindoor-and-future-indian-deterrence